Corporate Practice
AAEM's Letter to the Inspector General
by Robert McNamara, MD FAAEM
If you have been following AAEM's advocacy efforts over the past year
you are well aware that we have been working very hard to "open the
books" to the working emergency physician. This is obviously important
to you so that you can avoid being party to fraud and upcoding, but there
is a deeper purpose to these efforts.
It is AAEM's belief that the forced fee-splitting that is commonplace
in Emergency Medicine violates the federal and state anti-kickback laws.
Essentially, we are being charged a "right to work" fee by contract
holders. If we can prove (and this is where the open books is key and
why it is so threatening to corporate EM) that the amount of our professional
fees that is taken is beyond "fair market value" for what the
contract holders return, AAEM believes remedies should be available through
these existing laws.
AAEM believes that the current system in EM is a reversal of how it is
supposed to work. We support the idea that the physicians should receive
the fees and then determine what they will pay for management and other
services. This is in the best interest of the patient, the physician,
and those entities, including the federal government, that are paying
for our services. The following letter is part of our campaign to address
these concerns.
January 5, 1998
June Gibbs Brown
Office of the Inspector General
Department of Health and Human Services
330 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20201
RE: Illegal Kickbacks in Emergency Medicine
Dear Ms. Brown:
As President of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM) I
am soliciting the assistance of your office in an important matter.
AAEM believes that many emergency physicians are being forced into contractual
relationships that violate the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute,
42 USC 1320a-7b (b). Specifically, emergency physicians are required
to pay corporate Emergency Medicine staffing companies amounts that
exceed fair market value of the services provided to them. This payment
is made in exchange for the right to work in hospital emergency departments
where the corporation "owns" the contract.
This is widespread in Emergency Medicine. Estimates are that 60% or
more of emergency physicians may be affected by this. The Emergency
Medicine marketplace is currently dominated by large corporate staffing
companies. In many areas the emergency physicians have no other options
for employment. This problem is exemplified by the 1996 annual report
of EmCare (1717 Main Street, Suite 5200, Dallas, TX 75201). EmCare reported
receiving $33,211,000 of profit in 1996 from emergency physicians professional
fees. EmCare staffed 139 emergency departments in 1996 and, assuming
an average of five full-time emergency physicians per emergency department,
AAEM estimates that each emergency physicians had $50,000 of their professional
fees paid to EmCare. A significant portion of this is from Medicare
and Medicaid funds that are supposedly directed to the physician. EmCare
provides little more than a scheduling function for the emergency physicians,
and it is AAEM's belief that this $50,000 is well beyond fair market
value for the services EmCare provides.
Importantly, this is a forced splitting of fees as the emergency physician
has no other recourse for seeking privileges as an emergency physician
in a hospital where a corporation holds the contract. Seeking privileges
at another hospital is difficult given the dominance of such arrangements
in Emergency Medicine. The list of corporations operating in this manner
is extensive and includes EmCare and Spectrum (both now part of Laidlaw,
Inc.), Coastal Physician Group, Inc., Med Partners, PhyCor, Inc., Sterling
Healthcare (now part of FPA Medical Management), and National Emergency
Services. The larger groups are publicly traded with stockholders receiving
monies derived from the physician fees.
It is the belief of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine that
the Medicare program does not benefit from kickbacks to these corporations.
The monies that are directed for the payment of physicians professional
fees under Part B of the Medicare program are being diverted to corporate
profit with attendant excessive corporate salaries. EmCare reported
a profit of $33 million from 139 emergency departments. When one realizes
that there are approximately 5,000 emergency departments nationwide,
the amount of these kickbacks on a national level is very high. As stockholders
clamor for their dividends derived from the Part B payments there are
fewer funds available to reimburse the physicians. This may affect the
quality of care to Medicare beneficiaries as the corporations seek to
hire less costly, less qualified emergency physicians.
I am including a copy of material from the EmCare 1996 Annual Report
and an EmCare Holdings, Inc. Proxy Statement* to back up the claims
we are making. AAEM stands ready to assist your office in this matter.
We are seeking direction from your office as to how we can assist our
member emergency physicians who find themselves forced into such a predicament.
Sincerely yours,
Robert M. McNamara, MD FAAEM
President, AAEM
*AAEM members who wish to receive copies of these materials should call
the AAEM office at (800) 884-2236.
|